The use of western and eastern to describe certain parts of the world has not always bothered me. In fact, I drank the social studies Kool-Aid just like most of my peers in elementary, middle and high school. We were part of “the western world” and that was that. I wasn’t bothered…I wasn’t even apathetic. Critical thinking of this nature didn’t reach my cranial hemispheres until my mid twenties. So the world is a sphere. It’s round. West and East are sort of arbitrary directions that we use in order to reign in some control of our spinning globe.
Curiously, I found my way to Wikipedia for a rather interesting article on the “Eastern World“:
The division between “East” and “West” is a product of European cultural history, and of the distinction between European Christendom and the alien cultures beyond it to the East. Before the discovery of the Americas and the exploration of Sub-Saharan Africa by the Europeans, only North Africa and other Islamic countries to the East were known in detail, though India and China were vaguely known of. The crusades established what became a border between “Eastern” and “Western” peoples.
Basically, by framing groups of people as being in either the east or the west, we have a rather disgusting way of creating “us” and them”. Let’s call it historical semantic othering.
I was fascinated by this particular comic (really I dig all of them) in xkdc.com because I frequently mention “Western Culture” and “Non-Western Culture” in my job as an academic advisor. Are you curious as to why this occurs? Maybe, maybe not, but here’s the reason: GEO 105 and GEO 106.
Whether or not this was done purposefully, the “West” has been placed at the center or as “that by which everything else is defined”. You’re either part of the western world or you’re not. It’s not a very equitable situation. I’ve often wondered why GEO 105 was not named “Geography of the Eastern World”.
I guess it’s time for me to send of some inquiries to the GEO Department to ask them if they are bothered by this too…