<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASPA + Abercrombie &#038; Fitch</title>
	<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/</link>
	<description>| social justice | higher education | technology |</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Eric Stoller</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14881</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14881</guid>
					<description>NASPA has decided that it will not be partnering with A&#038;F. See the update at the top of the post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NASPA has decided that it will not be partnering with A&#038;F. See the update at the top of the post&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14823</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14823</guid>
					<description>Uuh..... yeah, I'll go with that.  Yay for common ground!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uuh&#8230;.. yeah, I&#8217;ll go with that.  Yay for common ground!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FinanceBuzz</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14820</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14820</guid>
					<description>Perhaps we agree on something - distaste for A&#38;F.  I was more concerned of the nearly soft-porn nature of their marketing photos on their sites.  I am concerned with the message these photos send than the color of a few models used to shoot them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps we agree on something - distaste for A&amp;F.  I was more concerned of the nearly soft-porn nature of their marketing photos on their sites.  I am concerned with the message these photos send than the color of a few models used to shoot them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14809</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14809</guid>
					<description>Call me when A&#38;F sees the light, stops selling anything for money, and turns into a social-justice nonprofit with the goals of eliminating patriarchy, racism, and other forms of oppression.

That's who NASPA should be partnering with.

Eric, I can't wait until you're required to wear A&#38;F gear while on the job!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me when A&amp;F sees the light, stops selling anything for money, and turns into a social-justice nonprofit with the goals of eliminating patriarchy, racism, and other forms of oppression.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s who NASPA should be partnering with.</p>
<p>Eric, I can&#8217;t wait until you&#8217;re required to wear A&amp;F gear while on the job!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Luke</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14803</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2007/09/09/naspa-abercrombie-fitch/#comment-14803</guid>
					<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...NASPA has both the real capacity and ethical responsibility to positively influence the policies and practices of corporate entities such as A&#38;F. It is not enough to cast blame and make accusations; just as we teach our students that leaders must serve an active and constructive role in helping to bring about improvement change, so must we also role model the way.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wouldn't say that I disagree with this statement; however, the inclusion of this statement &lt;i&gt;with the corporate sponsorship&lt;/i&gt; makes me feel that NASPA is trying to associate corporate change with corporate partnering.  Those are two seperate concepts, and one does not necessarily follow from the other.

&lt;blockquote&gt;This partnership will give A&#38;F and NASPA an opportunity to learn from each other.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

How?  Is this just vague double-speak?  "We will learn how A&#38;F sends money to non-profit organizations, and they will learn how flexible our ethics are" wouldn't count as learning, IMHO.

&lt;blockquote&gt;In addition, it gives A&#38;F an opportunity to hear from student affairs educators what we are doing to promote the values of diversity, multiculturalism, and social justice on a grassroots level.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Great.  Break out the champagne, I'm sure A&#38;F will love to read about what NASPA is doing in a once-a-quarter newsletter.

Ugh, I can't even begin to talk about the rest.  It uses so many forms of poor logic, including but not limited to: use of meaningless statistics, referencing authority, tokenism...

Can you tell that I have strong problems with "corporate charity"?  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;NASPA has both the real capacity and ethical responsibility to positively influence the policies and practices of corporate entities such as A&amp;F. It is not enough to cast blame and make accusations; just as we teach our students that leaders must serve an active and constructive role in helping to bring about improvement change, so must we also role model the way.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that I disagree with this statement; however, the inclusion of this statement <i>with the corporate sponsorship</i> makes me feel that NASPA is trying to associate corporate change with corporate partnering.  Those are two seperate concepts, and one does not necessarily follow from the other.</p>
<blockquote><p>This partnership will give A&amp;F and NASPA an opportunity to learn from each other.</p></blockquote>
<p>How?  Is this just vague double-speak?  &#8220;We will learn how A&amp;F sends money to non-profit organizations, and they will learn how flexible our ethics are&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t count as learning, IMHO.</p>
<blockquote><p>In addition, it gives A&amp;F an opportunity to hear from student affairs educators what we are doing to promote the values of diversity, multiculturalism, and social justice on a grassroots level.</p></blockquote>
<p>Great.  Break out the champagne, I&#8217;m sure A&amp;F will love to read about what NASPA is doing in a once-a-quarter newsletter.</p>
<p>Ugh, I can&#8217;t even begin to talk about the rest.  It uses so many forms of poor logic, including but not limited to: use of meaningless statistics, referencing authority, tokenism&#8230;</p>
<p>Can you tell that I have strong problems with &#8220;corporate charity&#8221;?  <img src='http://ericstoller.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
