<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.7" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Common Elements of Oppressions</title>
	<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/</link>
	<description>| social justice | higher education | technology |</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.7</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Community forum series &#187; Eric Stoller&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22627</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22627</guid>
					<description>[...] Race, gender, ability, and class are parts of us upon which various forms of institutional oppression have been created to benefit some while harming people in marginalized groups. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Race, gender, ability, and class are parts of us upon which various forms of institutional oppression have been created to benefit some while harming people in marginalized groups. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Knemon</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22327</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 00:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22327</guid>
					<description>"What goes unnoted is the necessity for poverty in an economic system in which wealth is held and controlled by the few."

As opposed to the disappearance of poverty in economic systems in which ownership is collective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What goes unnoted is the necessity for poverty in an economic system in which wealth is held and controlled by the few.&#8221;</p>
<p>As opposed to the disappearance of poverty in economic systems in which ownership is collective?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Buckley Post &#171; Automatic Preference</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22182</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 17:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-22182</guid>
					<description>[...] Some things I think are parallel and some clearly aren&#8217;t.  But maybe there are some common elements of oppression here.    (I found the link to Eric Stoller&#8217;s blog via Slant Truth.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Some things I think are parallel and some clearly aren&#8217;t.  But maybe there are some common elements of oppression here.    (I found the link to Eric Stoller&#8217;s blog via Slant Truth.) [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Suzanne Pharr &#187; Eric Stoller&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-21578</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 04:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-21578</guid>
					<description>[...] I was introduced to Suzanne Pharr via a reading assignment while in the class, Ethics of Diversity at Oregon State University in 2006. We were assigned to read &#8220;The Common Elements of Oppressions&#8221; &#8212; a chapter in Pharr&#8217;s book, Hetersexism: A weapon of homophobia. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the chapter and hoped to put it on my blog. I did quite a few Google searches and could not find an electronic copy of the chapter. I had found Suzanne&#8217;s website and decided to send her an email to see if she had an electronic copy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I was introduced to Suzanne Pharr via a reading assignment while in the class, Ethics of Diversity at Oregon State University in 2006. We were assigned to read &#8220;The Common Elements of Oppressions&#8221; &#8212; a chapter in Pharr&#8217;s book, Hetersexism: A weapon of homophobia. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the chapter and hoped to put it on my blog. I did quite a few Google searches and could not find an electronic copy of the chapter. I had found Suzanne&#8217;s website and decided to send her an email to see if she had an electronic copy. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: FAQ: Aren&#8217;t feminists just sexists towards men? &#171; Finally, A Feminism 101 Blog</title>
		<link>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-16250</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://ericstoller.com/blog/2006/03/31/the-common-elements-of-oppressions/#comment-16250</guid>
					<description>[...] If women and people of color were not in business (because of the social and cultural restrictions on them) when the first male business organizations were formed, then they now have to fight for inclusion. The curious thing about lack of prior claim is that it is simply the circumstances of the moment that put the original people there in every case, yet when those who were initially excluded begin asking for or demanding inclusion, they are seen as disruptive people, as trouble-makers, as no doubt anti-American. We still recall the verbal and physical violence against women who participated in the Suffrage Movement and the black men and women who formed the Civil Rights Movement. For simply asking for one’s due, one was vilified and abused. This is an effective technique, making those struggling for their rights the ones in the wrong. Popular movements are invalidated and minimized, their participants cast as enemies of the people, and social change is obstructed by those holding power who cast themselves as defenders of tradition and order. [Suzanne Pharr (Eric Stoller&#8217;s blog): The Common Elements of Oppressions.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] If women and people of color were not in business (because of the social and cultural restrictions on them) when the first male business organizations were formed, then they now have to fight for inclusion. The curious thing about lack of prior claim is that it is simply the circumstances of the moment that put the original people there in every case, yet when those who were initially excluded begin asking for or demanding inclusion, they are seen as disruptive people, as trouble-makers, as no doubt anti-American. We still recall the verbal and physical violence against women who participated in the Suffrage Movement and the black men and women who formed the Civil Rights Movement. For simply asking for one’s due, one was vilified and abused. This is an effective technique, making those struggling for their rights the ones in the wrong. Popular movements are invalidated and minimized, their participants cast as enemies of the people, and social change is obstructed by those holding power who cast themselves as defenders of tradition and order. [Suzanne Pharr (Eric Stoller&#8217;s blog): The Common Elements of Oppressions.] [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
